THE TRUTH CALCULATOR™ / THE PLANNED UPGRADE
AdveriTrace™ Forensic Investigator
When the records disagree,
know what to check next.
A signed receipt. A damaged delivery. Two accounts of the same handover. Start with the records—and see what they can actually support.
Investigate a sample case See the upgrade valuePlanned upgrade · Not yet available to purchase
A SMALL INVESTIGATION. A USEFUL DIFFERENCE.
Try the moment that
changes the review.
Follow one statement back to its source. Then question that source and see exactly what becomes unresolved. No upload or signup is needed.
Prepared fictional demonstration of a planned workflow. No live AI, file analysis, authenticity finding, or real case processing.
Changing scenarios starts that fictional exercise fresh.
PREPARED CASE / 01
Was the damage present at handover?
The delivery receipt says no visible damage. A later receiving note says damage was visible at handover. Both records remain part of the matter.
Fictional exampleSTEP 1 OF 4
Every statement needs a place to start.
Select a record to inspect its exact prepared excerpt and its limits.
Dispatch checklist
“Crate exterior checked before dispatch. No visible damage recorded.”
This records a dispatch observation. It does not establish the condition at the later handover.
Original retained in this prepared example.
The delivery receipt
“Received at 09:02. No visible damage at handover.”
The receiving note
“At handover, the crate corner was already crushed.”
These records give conflicting accounts of the same handover. Keeping both visible helps a reviewer identify the question; it does not decide which account is accurate.
CHANGE THE WORKING VIEW
What if S-03 needs more review?
Temporarily exclude it from support. The original stays visible and can be restored.
S-03 reports that damage was visible at handover.
That is what the selected note says. Whether damage was actually present at handover remains unresolved.
Source retained · Included in selected support · No verdict
SOURCE-LINKED EXAMPLE
Review Draft
Question: Was damage present at handover?
Sequence in the selected records
What needs attention
Missing information
A practical next question
Prepared educational sample. Records are not authenticated. This is not legal advice, an expert finding, or a court-ready report.
View the complete sample text
WHY GO FURTHER?
One claim can open
a much larger matter.
The planned upgrade brings the related records into one reviewable account—with the supporting sources and the unanswered questions still attached.
THE FREE APP / PREPARING FOR RELEASE
Start with a claim.
Identify selected sources, gaps, and a sensible next question. Keep a decision receipt for that review.
- A focused question
- Selected sources and unresolved gaps
- A practical human next step
ADVERITRACE™ / PLANNED UPGRADE
Keep the matter connected.
Follow a sequence across records, versions, people, and events. Prepare a structured handoff for qualified human review.
- A source register and connected chronology
- Visible contradictions and source dependencies
- A Review Draft with gaps and next questions
one-time in-app purchase
Not yet available to purchase. Planned scope, price, and availability may change; release and App Review are required. Local pricing and taxes may vary.
Follow the release. Check your eligibility.
Eligible Founding Access subscribers may receive one complimentary Forensic Investigation upgrade when released. Join and confirm before the free app’s public App Store release; eligibility and redemption conditions apply.
No purchase necessary. A delayed release carries eligibility forward. Read the complete offer terms.
WHY THE RECORD MATTERS
When decisions need explaining,
the sources matter.
Congressional proposals are examining automated decisions and human safeguards. A clear account of the available records can help someone prepare informed questions for human review.
PROPOSED LEGISLATION / S.3308
Artificial Intelligence Civil Rights Act
The introduced text proposes protections for consequential algorithmic decisions, including evaluations, impact assessments, disclosures, and human alternatives.
Read the introduced bill (opens in a new tab)↗PROPOSED LEGISLATION / S.4833
No Robot Bosses Act
The proposal addresses automated systems used in workplace decisions, with safeguards intended to support oversight and human judgment.
Read the introduced bill (opens in a new tab)↗Introduced texts reviewed September 29, 2026. Proposals can change and do not establish an enacted compliance deadline here. AdveriTrace™ is a planned tool for organizing selected records; it does not perform a statutory algorithm audit, determine unlawful discrimination, certify compliance, or replace professional judgment.
GO AS DEEP AS YOUR QUESTION NEEDS
The complete method is here when you need it.
Explore the original home-repair matter, Source Gate, reconstruction steps, relationship exercise, and full Review Draft explanation. The separate future specialist paths are clearly identified within the detailed material.
Explore the full forensic workflowOriginal exercises, deeper explanations, future paths, and FAQs
These deeper exercises have their own controls and reset. They do not change the guided scenario above. Future specialist concepts are separate planned offerings, not included in the proposed $49.95 upgrade.
A question worth following
When one question leads to a larger story, keep the records connected.
A revised invoice. An earlier estimate. An email that leaves room for interpretation. See what changes when you examine them together.
Explore a fictional example here today. The Forensic upgrade is planned and is not yet available to purchase.
PLANNED CONCEPT · PREDETERMINED FICTIONAL DATA · NO REAL CASE ANALYSIS
When one claim becomes a larger matter, keep every receipt connected.
ADVERITRACE™ is a planned Forensic Investigation upgrade for The Truth Calculator™, intended to be powered by the qX‑TGRI™ evidence-readiness engine.
The planned workflow is intended to help a user organize, preserve, compare and trace user-selected records into a reviewable forensic receipt—without hiding contradictions or turning unresolved evidence into a verdict.
Preserve the source. Reconstruct the sequence. Test the explanation. Prepare a controlled handoff.
Review-ready, not court-ready.
01 · RECEIPT-TO-MATTER EXPANSION
A single claim is only the beginning.
A fictional homeowner receives a final invoice containing additional work and a higher price. The starting receipt asks one narrow question: Do the selected records document authorization for the revised work and price?
“The additional work was approved.”
The receipt does not decide whether the statement is true. It records the claim, selected support, conflict, open gap and next human action.
Static fallback: the complete prepared fictional matter is documented in the reconstruction table below. Interactive selection changes only the visible demonstration state and is never transmitted or retained.
02 · MATTER RECONSTRUCTION TABLE
Every proposition keeps its receipt.
Prepared records remain separate. A source may support a narrow proposition without proving the entire claim. Similar names and adjacent events are not merged into relationships automatically.
| Type and ID | Prepared record | Narrow proposition or role | Demonstration state |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source · S-001 | Signed original estimate | Identifies the original scope and price; does not address later additions. | Prepared—not yet added |
| Source · S-002 | Final invoice | Records that additional work and a higher amount were invoiced; does not prove authorization. | Prepared—not yet added |
| Source · S-003 | Email containing “Okay, proceed” | Records the quoted phrase; the selected email does not identify the revised scope or price. | CLEAR — prepared, not yet added |
| Source · S-004 | Unsigned scope-change document | Describes revised work and price; no signature appears in the selected record. | Prepared—not yet added |
| Source · S-005 | Payment record | Records an amount and date; does not establish what the payment accepted or resolved. | Prepared—not yet added |
| Gap · G-001 | Signed change approval not located | The selected record does not establish authorization for the exact revised scope and price. | Prepared gap—not yet added |
| Role · P-003 | Project manager reference | A role is mentioned. Similar names are not merged without distinguishing evidence. | Prepared—Identity unresolved |
| Version · S-006 | Later project-log version | Contains a different timestamp; the reason for the version difference is not established. | Prepared—not yet added |
Source · S-001
- Prepared record
- Signed original estimate
- Narrow proposition
- Identifies the original scope and price; does not address later additions.
- Demonstration state
- Prepared—not yet added
Source · S-002
- Prepared record
- Final invoice
- Narrow proposition
- Records that additional work and a higher amount were invoiced; does not prove authorization.
- Demonstration state
- Prepared—not yet added
Source · S-003
- Prepared record
- Email containing “Okay, proceed”
- Narrow proposition
- Records the quoted phrase; the selected email does not identify revised scope or price.
- Demonstration state
- CLEAR — prepared, not yet added
Source · S-004
- Prepared record
- Unsigned scope-change document
- Narrow proposition
- Describes revised work and price; no signature appears in the selected record.
- Demonstration state
- Prepared—not yet added
Source · S-005
- Prepared record
- Payment record
- Narrow proposition
- Records an amount and date; does not establish what the payment accepted or resolved.
- Demonstration state
- Prepared—not yet added
Gap · G-001
- Prepared record
- Signed change approval not located
- Narrow proposition
- The selected record does not establish authorization for the exact revised scope and price.
- Demonstration state
- Prepared—not yet added
Role · P-003
- Prepared record
- Project manager reference
- Narrow proposition
- A role is mentioned. Similar names are not merged without distinguishing evidence.
- Demonstration state
- Prepared—Identity unresolved
Version · S-006
- Prepared record
- Later project-log version
- Narrow proposition
- Contains a different timestamp; the reason for the version difference is not established.
- Demonstration state
- Prepared—not yet added
CHRONOLOGY
- E-001 · S-001Original estimate identifies scope and price.PREPARED — S-001 not added
- E-002 · S-004Unsigned scope-change document describes added work.PREPARED — S-004 not added
- E-003 · S-003Email records “Okay, proceed”; scope and price remain unresolved.PREPARED — S-003 not added
- E-004 · S-002Final invoice includes added work and higher price.PREPARED — S-002 not added
PEOPLE AND ROLES
- P-001: Homeowner — fictional record participant.
- P-002: Contractor — fictional record participant.
- P-003: Project manager reference — Identity unresolved. PREPARED — role not added
CITED RELATIONSHIPS
- S-001 → E-001: Directly cited by the prepared estimate. PREPARED — not active
- S-003 → E-003: Directly cited only for the email’s content. PREPARED — not active
- S-002 → E-004: Directly cited by the prepared invoice. PREPARED — not active
- P-001 → P-003: No direct relationship established.
COMPETING EXPLANATIONS
- H-001: Added work may have been authorized informally.
- H-002: The email may have referred only to the original scope.
- H-003: An approval record may exist outside the selected record.
These are hypotheses to test—not findings or probabilities.
03 · PREDICT THE CONSEQUENCE
Think before the record changes.
Prepared Source S-003 is the only prepared cited source for Event E-003 and Draft Finding F-002. If S-003 is added and then blocked from analysis and output, what should happen next?
Event E-003 and Draft Finding F-002 become unresolved. The chronology stays visible, the original source stays preserved, and the missing-source plan changes. No source or dependent proposition disappears silently.
04 · ADVERITRACE SOURCE GATE
A handling state is not a truth judgment.
Inspect the prepared states for Source S-003. Each state changes how the fictional source may influence downstream work. None authenticates the source or decides admissibility, motive or wrongdoing.
CLEAR — Eligible for this fictional workflow
No implemented handling condition currently blocks this fictional item. CLEAR does not mean verified, true, authentic, accurate, safe or admissible.
The source remains cited for its narrow proposition; its downstream use still carries the stated limitations.
CLEAR
No implemented handling condition currently blocks this fictional item. CLEAR does not mean verified, true, authentic, accurate, safe or admissible.
REVIEW
A condition requires user or qualified-human disposition before unqualified downstream use.
QUARANTINE
The original remains visible and preserved but is excluded from analysis and output while a material condition remains unresolved.
INCIDENT
A discrepancy or security indicator requires containment and review. It does not establish motive, authorship, manipulation, malicious intent or wrongdoing.
05 · GUIDED RECONSTRUCTION
Look at the record together
What would help the next person understand?
A photograph may show the work. An invoice records the amount requested. An approval may leave its scope unclear. Keep each source connected to the question it can help answer.
Use the steps below to explore the fictional record at your own pace.
Complexity becomes manageable in five controlled stages.
- 01
Preserve
Keep the selected original visible, distinguish it from derivatives and record handling limitations.
- 02
Organize
Assign stable source, event, role and version identities without merging similar names automatically.
- 03
Test
Compare complete propositions, contradictions and competing explanations against cited sources.
- 04
Fill gaps
Identify which additional source could resolve an open issue and document what was not located.
- 05
Prepare report
Assemble only eligible cited propositions into a controlled Review Draft for qualified human review.
06 · CONTRADICTION LENS
Two polished records can describe the same event differently.
This teaching lens always displays two prepared fictional records side by side. Viewing the lens does not add either source to the selected matter.
Two records describe the same event differently. What would help resolve the difference?
Original estimate
“The signed estimate identifies the original price and scope.”
Final invoice
“The final invoice includes additional work and a higher price.”
Conflicted — additional source required
No signed scope-change approval appears in the selected record. A signed change order, timestamped authorization, original project log or qualified human review may help resolve the difference.
The prepared record does not establish that either party lied, that one record is true, that anyone was overcharged, that fraud occurred or that a legal claim has been proved.
07 · PULL ONE RECEIPT
Remove one source. Watch every dependent statement answer for it.
Temporarily quarantine Source S-003. The original remains preserved and visible, but every dependent event, proposition and draft finding must change state.
- 1S-003 · SOURCE
Eligible for the prepared workflow; original preserved.
- 2E-003 · EVENT
Cited source S-003 remains eligible. The event records only what the email says.
- 3F-002 · DRAFT FINDING
Supported by cited record: S-003 contains the phrase “Okay, proceed.”
- 4G-001 · OPEN GAP
Locate a signed change order or other timestamped authorization specifying revised scope and price.
- 5A-001 · HUMAN ACTION
Qualified reviewer compares S-003 with the original estimate and any change-order record.
Persistent rule: A blocked source never disappears. Its original stays preserved, the chronology stays visible, and every dependent proposition becomes explicitly unresolved.
08 · RELATIONSHIP CHALLENGE
Connection is not transitive proof.
Known: A → B and B → C. Does the selected record establish A → C?
A → C is not established.
A direct relationship requires its own cited basis. Repetition, sequence and similar names do not establish identity or relationship. Without distinguishing evidence: Identity unresolved.
09 · CONTROLLED OUTPUT PREVIEW
Forensic Litigation Output — Review Draft
Preview a fictional Forensic Litigation Output — Review Draft showing what selected sources support, where records conflict, what remains missing, what the record does not prove and what requires qualified human review.
Forensic Litigation Output — Review Draft
- Matter ID
- FIC-HR-001
- Selected scope
- Authorization for revised work and price
- Version
- Fictional Preview 1.0
- As of
- Prepared demonstration; no real case date
WHAT CITED SOURCES ESTABLISH
- No selected source currently contributes an eligible supported proposition.
- S-001 identifies the original scope and price.
- S-002 records additional work and a higher invoiced amount.
- S-003 contains the phrase “Okay, proceed”; it does not identify the revised scope or price.
- S-004 describes revised work and price, but no signature appears in the selected record.
- S-005 records a payment amount and date; it does not establish acceptance or resolution.
- S-006 contains a different event timestamp; the reason for the version difference is not established.
WHAT CONFLICTS
The original estimate and final invoice describe materially different scope and price, while no signed scope-change approval appears in the complete prepared static record.
WHAT REMAINS UNRESOLVED
- Whether “Okay, proceed” authorized the precise revised scope and price remains unresolved.
- Use of S-003 remains unresolved pending its handling-state disposition.
WHAT THE RECORD DOES NOT PROVE
The selected record does not prove fraud, intent, credibility, liability, damages, admissibility, legal sufficiency, case merit or that either party’s complete account is true.
EXCLUDED OR BLOCKED SOURCES
No prepared source is blocked in the current demonstration.
RECORDS REVIEWED / NOT LOCATED
Selected: R-001 plus prepared Sources S-001 through S-006 in this static fallback.
Not located: Signed change order identifying the revised scope and price.
Record-scope limitation: “Selected record” means only the prepared fictional items displayed on this page. It does not represent a complete matter or a finding that all relevant records were located.
SEARCH-SCOPE LIMITATIONS
Only the prepared fictional records displayed on this page were considered. No external search, authentication, legal research, deadline calculation or completeness determination was performed.
REDACTIONS AND OTHER LIMITATIONS
No redaction review, privilege review or suitability determination was performed. Redactions, confidentiality, governing law, deadlines and fitness for any intended use require independent qualified review.
NEXT QUALIFIED-HUMAN REVIEW
Compare S-003 with the original estimate and seek a signed or timestamped authorization identifying the revised work and price.
SOURCE REGISTER
R-001 parent Decision Receipt · S-001 estimate · S-002 invoice · S-003 email · S-004 unsigned scope change · S-005 payment record · S-006 later project log.
CHANGE RECORD
No prepared source-state change is active.
A clearer picture, ready to discuss
The planned deliverable brings the records and the questions together in an organized review package, so a qualified reviewer can follow the reasoning and see what still needs attention.
- A clear account of the matterThe question, relevant events and competing explanations.
- Supporting records in contextSources connected to the statements they support.
- Open questions made visibleConflicts, missing information and limits that still need checking.
- A practical starting point for reviewUseful next questions and a traceable record of how the pieces fit.
This example shows the intended approach. The upgrade is in development, and the final deliverable will be confirmed before release. It supports qualified human review; it does not replace it.
10 · THE NEXT LOGICAL STEP
Upgrade when the matter becomes larger—not because a page pressures you.
Free Truth Gap Check
- One consequential claim
- Supporting sources and open gaps
- Conflict surrounding one decision
- One Decision Receipt
- A human next action
ADVERITRACE™ Forensic Investigation
- A multi-event matter
- Source register, versions and handling states
- Cross-record contradictions and chronology
- Linked forensic reconstruction
- Missing-source plan and qualified-review handoff
Planned and not currently available or purchasable. This is not an offer or preorder. Planned scope and price may change. Local pricing and taxes may vary; availability is subject to product release and App Review.
Separate future specialist paths — not included in this upgrade
11 · SEPARATELY PLANNED SPECIALIST PATHS
The receipt pattern can travel farther than the consumer matter.
These are high-level fictional receipt patterns, not operational demonstrations and not capabilities included in the planned $49.95 Forensic upgrade.
Mars autonomous robotics
Connect mission objective, robot identity, software build, sensor provenance, terrain condition, anomaly, open gap and human mission review.
AI-generated illustration · Not an actual deployment · Not included in the planned $49.95 Forensic upgrade
Civil aerospace/UAS
Connect inspection purpose, aircraft configuration, maintenance state, environmental source, limitation, discrepancy and human go/no-go review.
AI-generated illustration · Not an actual deployment · Not included in the planned $49.95 Forensic upgrade
Autonomous drone swarm assurance
For a non-weaponized training or infrastructure-inspection scenario, connect authorized purpose, membership, configuration, test evidence, discrepancy and human authorization.
AI-generated illustration · Not an actual deployment · Not included in the planned $49.95 Forensic upgrade
Counter-drone decision receipt
For a fictional simulation, connect alert provenance, corroboration, configuration, uncertainty, authorized policy and qualified human review.
AI-generated illustration · Not an actual deployment · Not included in the planned $49.95 Forensic upgrade12 · TRUST BY DESIGN
The evidence stays visible. The decision stays human.
Private interaction
This page-local demonstration code accepts no files, case descriptions or personal information. It keeps prepared selections only in temporary page memory, resets them on refresh and does not send them through a network request or place them in a URL, cookie, analytics event or persistent storage. The hosting platform may separately process standard page requests under the site’s published privacy terms.
Qualified human authority
ADVERITRACE is planned to organize and trace user-selected records. It does not determine truth, guilt, fraud, intent, credibility, liability, damages, admissibility, legal sufficiency, case merit or litigation outcome.
Review-ready, not court-ready
It does not give legal advice, calculate legal deadlines, create attorney work product or privilege, authenticate evidence, or file, send, serve or submit documents. ADVERITRACE does not operate as law enforcement or a private investigator and does not automatically trigger professional or external action.
No hidden certainty
Unsupported propositions remain visible as unresolved. Blocked sources remain preserved. A workflow state never becomes a truth, safety, compliance or authenticity score.
If a hash appears in a future build: A hash can help compare whether two files contain the same bytes. It does not establish authenticity, authorship, completeness, lawful acquisition or admissibility.
13 · QUESTIONS BEFORE RELEASE
What this planned upgrade is—and is not.
Is ADVERITRACE available to purchase now?
No. It is a planned future upgrade and is not currently available or purchasable. The planned U.S. App Store price is $49.95 as a one-time non-consumable in-app purchase. This is not an offer or preorder. Scope and price may change; local pricing and taxes may vary, and availability remains subject to product release and App Review.
Does a Review Draft make my materials court-ready?
No. It is a controlled organization and handoff aid for qualified human review. It does not determine admissibility, legal sufficiency, privilege, deadlines, liability, case merit or filing readiness.
Does ADVERITRACE decide which record is true?
No. It is planned to preserve source identities, expose conflict, document gaps and maintain traceability. It does not make a truth, credibility, fraud or intent determination.
Does this page accept my documents or case details?
No. The interactive experience uses predetermined fictional data only. It offers no uploads or free-text case fields and does not transmit or retain interaction selections.
Do the specialist examples come with the $49.95 upgrade?
No. Mars robotics, aerospace/UAS, autonomous drone swarm assurance and counter-drone examples are separately planned illustrative receipt patterns. They are not capabilities promised in the Forensic upgrade.
THE NEXT STEP
A stronger review starts
with a traceable record.
Explore the method now. Follow AdveriTrace™ as the planned upgrade develops.
Release updates use the existing Founding Access subscription and consent. No purchase or preorder is offered on this page.